Opinion Opinion L.A.
Opinion

Jesus in Congress: Actually, most of the prayers there are ecumenical

Is Congress a (mostly) Jesus-free zone? It seems that way
Prayers by regular House chaplain Patrick Conroy, a Jesuit priest, are studiously nonsectarian
See for yourself: The House website helpfully provides an archive of invocations

On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that it was constitutional to begin government meetings with prayers, even if they are overwhelmingly Christian in character. The case involved invocations offered by guest chaplains at town meetings in Greece, N.Y. But there was also discussion of the prayers offered at sessions of Congress. Readers of the decision might be left wondering whether Jesus’ name is regularly invoked in prayers at the Capitol.

In his majority opinion, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy referred to an invocation in the House of Representatives in 2010 that was offered “in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.” But in his dissenting opinion, Justice Stephen G. Breyer noted that guest chaplains in the House are reminded that “the House of Representatives is comprised of members of many different faith traditions” and they are told that prayers must be “free from ... sectarian controversies.”

So who’s right? Is Congress a (mostly) Jesus-free zone?

It seems that way. Here’s a prayer offered by the chaplain of the Senate, the Rev. Barry Black, a Seventh-Day Adventist:

“Lord God Omnipotent, You are above all nations. Take our lives and use them for Your purposes. Lord, cleanse our hearts, forgive our sins, and teach us to amend our ways as Your transforming grace changes our lives. Today, inspire our senators to be true servants of Your will. In these challenging times, give them the wisdom to labor for justice, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with You. Keep their minds and spirits steady as they strive to please You. We pray in Your sacred Name. Amen.”

There’s nothing in that prayer that a Jew, a Muslim or a Unitarian could object to (though an atheist or Wiccan might protest).

In the House, prayers are occasionally offered in Jesus’ name: On April 29, the Rev. Benny Lee, a guest chaplain, intoned: “We pray this prayer, respecting all faiths, but pray it in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.” But they are rare, thanks in large part to the regular House chaplain, a Jesuit priest named Patrick J. Conroy.

Conroy is studiously nonsectarian. His latest prayer, offered on April 28, is typical. It addresses “Dear God,” with no mention of Jesus (or the Virgin Mary, the saints or Conroy’s fellow Jesuit Pope Francis).

The House website helpfully provides an archive of invocations, and I picked two months at random — March and April 2013 — and read all the prayers offered by Conroy and various guest chaplains.

Conroy delivered 17 opening prayers over that period. None mentioned Jesus, though in some of the prayers, Conroy asked God to send “Your Spirit” to guide the assembled politicians, arguably an allusion to the Christian doctrine of the Holy Trinity. On one occasion he also referred to the “two-edged sword of Your Word and Your purity of Spirit.” In Christian doctrine, the word (or logos) of God is Jesus, so this could be counted as a Christian prayer. But “Your Word” could also refer to the pronouncements of a Unitarian deity.

Most of the guest chaplains in this period were equally restrained, but there were outliers. In a rare flirtation with fire and brimstone, the Rev. Brian Lee prayed on April 30: “You are a God who saves. Convict us of all our sins that we might know deliverance from these our wicked ways. Hear this prayer for the sake of the merits of Your only Son, the crucified and risen Lord, Jesus Christ.”

The bottom line is that Breyer is right: Most clergy who offer invocations at sessions of Congress have learned how to pray in an ecumenical and inclusive way. Maybe the town fathers of Greece, N.Y., should hire Father Conroy as a consultant.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • A prayer paradox at the Supreme Court
    A prayer paradox at the Supreme Court

    Constitutional issues involving the separation of church and state are full of paradoxes, and Wednesday’s argument in the Supreme Court over prayers at town meetings illuminated one of them.

  • Why is the Obama administration bowing to religion?
    Why is the Obama administration bowing to religion?

    Oddly, it has chosen to defend an unconstitutional prayer policy before the Supreme Court.

  • With friends like these, who needed enemies in 2014?
    With friends like these, who needed enemies in 2014?

    In soccer it's called an "own goal," when a player inadvertently kicks the ball into his own net.

  • The problem of dual citizenship
    The problem of dual citizenship

    Before becoming a naturalized U.S. citizen, immigrants must take an oath that says, in part, "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been...

  • America needs to study the enemy within
    America needs to study the enemy within

    When I was living in Chile in 1968, my Chilean friends often explained to me proudly that their country was different from other Latin American countries. Chile had a long democratic tradition. Its armed forces had rarely and only briefly meddled in the government, and not at all since 1932....

  • Why real change in Cuba won't come easy or fast
    Why real change in Cuba won't come easy or fast

    The historic agreement between Presidents Obama and Raul Castro has opened what Obama calls "a new chapter" in relations between the United States and Cuba, but we are still on the first page. The rest of the chapter remains to be written. What comes next?

Comments
Loading