Opinion Opinion L.A.
Opinion

Is it really a wonderful time for women on TV, as Julianna Margulies says?

'What a wonderful time for women on television,' Julianna Margulies said during her Emmys acceptance speech
Female characters appear almost 50% less frequently than males as a lead or protagonist in prime-time TV
Jodie Foster and Angelina Jolie look at scripts written for male leads to 'gender-flip'

Julianna Margulies, in her Emmys speech Monday night, noted, “What a wonderful time for women on television.”

Margulies plays a smart, successful lawyer on “The Good Wife” (even if she didn’t have the sense to leave her rotten, cheating husband). The characters played by the rest of the Emmy-nominated drama series actresses hold dream jobs we want for our daughters: CIA agent, Beltway power-broker, academic researcher, heir to a gorgeous English estate.

And that is good news. As Gail Mancuso, “Modern Family” director and Emmy winner, says, “Seeing is believing.” Seeing women having success in ways women haven’t traditionally done so opens the way for girls to think they might grow up to be such successes too.

MORE EMMYS: Show recap | Quotes from the stars | Best and worst | Winners room | Complete list

But, really, why does Alicia stay with Peter, in a circumscribed, compromised marriage? Can you imagine a male protagonist lawyer sublimating and hanging on like that? Or, why is a woman as talented as Carrie Mathison doing time in the loony bin in “Homeland”? Try putting, say, Sean Connery in that script.

Try imagining someone who doesn’t look fabulous in a gown on the Emmys stage in those roles. The truth is, female characters appear almost 50% less frequently than males as a lead or protagonist in prime-time television; they’re four times more likely to be scantily clothed and three times as likely to be physically attractive; and they hold only a third of onscreen jobs of any type — much less jobs in science and technology.

Is it telling that actors like Jodie Foster and Angelina Jolie look at scripts written for male leads to “gender-flip”?

There are some fabulous exceptions. “Orange Is the New Black” brings more diversity of women to the television screen than the rest of the industry combined. (OK, we don’t want our daughters to grow up to be prison inmates, but still.) “Girls” allows even slightly chubby girls to imagine that they too might someday have sex.

Those exceptions differ from most of what television offers these days in one very distinctive way: They are created by women — Jenji Kohan and Leah Dunham, respectively.

They employ more women writers too. And they welcome women into the director’s chair.

The fact is that women behind the scenes in television have a positive effect on the portrayal of women onscreen. Martha Lauzen, executive director of the Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film, has found that shows with female writers feature female characters more often. Even more so if women have created a show. She’s found “some interesting relationships between the employment of women in powerful behind-the-scenes roles and on-screen gender stereotyping” too.

Steven Colbert said Monday night in his speech: “I’m so proud of those guys and one woman…. Sorry for that, for some reason.” It’s not exactly clear what that “sorry” meant — whether he was poking fun at the lack of diversity in his writer ranks, at the folks who point to that lack, or at something else entirely. (To be fair, the 10 producers who took home Emmys as a result of “The Colbert Report” best variety show win included three women, closer to the industry average of 38%.)

But there is another reason Colbert might want to be sorry for not employing more women writers: the success of female writers at the Emmys. In Colbert’s variety series writers category, of the 71 nominees — so many that it would be utterly embarrassing for any show to exclude women entirely — only 12 were women, with only a single female “head writer.” In the other categories where women writers were nominated, though, Moira Walley-Beckett and Sarah Silverman took home two of the three Emmys up for grabs.

Only four women were nominated for directing Emmys, but women won in every category in which they had a shot. The only female director who lost was Jodie Foster; the comedy directing Emmy she was nominated for went home for the second time with Mancuso, who became the first female director to repeat.

For women who made it to the Emmys, it was, indeed, a wonderful time. Now if only there were more of them behind the scenes.

Meg Waite Clayton is the author of four novels, including the forthcoming "The Wednesday Daughters." www.megwaiteclayton.com

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Should non-citizens in the U.S. vote?
    Should non-citizens in the U.S. vote?

    As of Jan. 1, 2012, an estimated 13.3 million lawful permanent residents lived in the United States, and 8.8 million of them were eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship but had not done so. In California, 2.48 million out of 3.4 million green-card holders were eligible to apply but chose not...

  • Obama's fourth-quarter foreign policy surprises
    Obama's fourth-quarter foreign policy surprises

    Six months ago, President Obama's foreign policy looked stymied. Negotiations with Israel and the Palestinians were at a dead end. Russia was gaining ground in eastern Ukraine. U.S. efforts to end the war in Syria were ineffective. A new extremist army, Islamic State, was marching into Iraq.

  • Ukraine should put Russia to the test
    Ukraine should put Russia to the test

    Ukraine is now strong enough to seize the initiative to create a lasting cease-fire in its Donbas Rust Belt, currently occupied by Russia and its proxies. And Russia may be weak enough to be receptive. It is in Kiev's interest to do so. A state of permanent war with Russia would damage...

  • The great fear of the great outdoors
    The great fear of the great outdoors

    Americans find ourselves in a period — arguably, the first in our nation's history — when our unease about being in nature is coming to outweigh our desire for it. We have a growing intolerance for inconvenience, a feeling well captured by the suburban fifth-grader who memorably...

  • Animals and humans sometimes kill their young -- the question is why
    Animals and humans sometimes kill their young -- the question is why

    Among the endless stream of bad news in the media, every now and then something occurs that it is so horrendous that it stops us in our tracks. That has happened once again with Tuesday's massacre at a school in Peshawar, Pakistan. Among the victims: 132 children who died — many of them...

  • The snackification of everything
    The snackification of everything

    Symbols matter, which is why it's important to acknowledge that our truest national emblem isn't an eagle or a dollar sign or even a handgun, though each will have its proponents.

Comments
Loading