Advertisement

Of Frogs and Swains

Share
<i> Herbert Gold's most recent novel, "'She Took My Arm as if She Loved Me," has been reissued in paperback (St. Martin's Press)</i>

Laughing out loud while reading is a practice I’ve never developed--especially at writing designed to be comical--but somehow in the lonely contemplation of recent times, a couple of writers have caused me to frighten the neighbors with hoarse cackling. William Kotzwinkle’s novel about the book business, “The Bear Went Over the Mountain,” a fantastic adventure of an ursine creature hailed as the new Hemingway, is one. And now comes T. Coraghessan Boyle’s monster collection of stories, most but not all from previous collections, forthrightly entitled, “Stories.” Both Kotzwinkle and Boyle do the job of precise naming of the world while not avoiding personal feelings about it. The result is an aha reaction, a sense of: “That’s how it is; I never thought of it like that; now I do.”

And caught in the embrace of exacting intelligence, the reader laughs, because of course it’s fantasy realism. Boyle’s stories are grouped under the three categories of “Love,” “Death” “And Everything in Between,” which pretty much covers our experience, doesn’t it? His stance is mostly ironic, but only mostly; there are also persistent yearnings: a young man’s helpless need for love; an adolescent’s metaphysical brutality about who am I, why am I, where am I; an American’s wonderment at the miracles of this rich, distracted, dangerous civilization we have created. Because Boyle now lives in Southern California (he teaches at USC), he has a special interest in local doings. A number of the stories reflect the styles, habits and endearing New Ageness of a certain California.

“Stories” is a great fat book, nearly 700 pages, by a youngish writer making his claim to Maestro status. A few of the early stories (here comes chacun a son gou^t time) seem to be merely exercises, a bright kid sweating out a ‘70s-era Jorge Luis Borges infection, sharpening his knives in the drawer without having a great deal on the table to slice into, but even the weaker constructions (chacun a son gou^t redux) reveal a writer born to elegance and equipped with keen eyes, ears and a preternatural skill at evoking the objects of his roving interest. For example, Boyle seems to like animals and makes dogs an occasion. (Attention pet fanciers: “Heart of a Champion.”) Because dogs are not every person’s best friend,some of the constituency may belost. What carried me through the pet episodes was admiration for the operation. But other readers, major species fanatics, might choose them above the tales of misbegotten love, such as “Without a Hero,” the story of a greedy spendthrift Russian immigrant who drives her American lover crazy with her wiles, her wetness and the wagging of her tail. When he thinks great sex is on the way, she coos in her enticing way: Should she put her money in CDs or mutual funds?

Advertisement

Another hilarious tale of male victimization is “Carnal Knowledge,” in which a lonely guy meets a stalwart, long-legged activist, enjoys terrific sex but then is enlisted in her turkey-liberating raid. A dog named Alf, for Animal Liberation Front, plays a supporting role in this story, but that’s OK with me. (I like Harry Dean Stanton but not necessarily as the lead.)

In “Descent of Man,” the genial ape who translates Milton and signs apposite quotations from Yeats steals the live-in girlfriend of a fellow hapless enough to fall for a woman infatuated with primates. This story was published in 1974, which means the theme of committed female, distraught male has been engaged since early in Boyle’s career. (Sub-theme: Animal nature is strictly contiguous with the human variety.) But even then, apparently awed by the power of a woman’s obsession, Boyle suggests that the man deserves what he gets. And the reader gets the benefit of an ironic story: That’s how it is, fellow lads.

Many of the “love” stories depict fidgeting in the grip of women who know what they want. I can imagine the dread word “misogyny” rising from a few strict bosoms out there, but wait--these women are allowed not only their wiles but also their charm and integrity. Some of the vision is not pretty but, on the other hand, it is pretty because it’s funny, accurate and depicts the war between the sexes in the late 20th century as a trade war. The author of “Riven Rock,” “The Road to Wellville,” “The Tortilla Curtain” and five other novels, Boyle finds the intense, rapid-moving spotlight of the short story especially suited to his brigand’s play with language.

Sometimes it’s a Cirque du Soleil act, pirouettes and poetry, clownish reversals that evoke sighs of delight. There is a mild example from still another sort-of love story, “Hopes Rise,” about another charmer focused to the point of obsession (frogs and toads are going extinct) and her abject swain (his back is going bad). They are on a train to Manhattan, Cheever and Updike country, but in Boyle country the scene unfolds like this: “It might have been one of those golden, delicately lit spring mornings invested with all the warmth and urgency of the season, bees hovering, buds unfolding, the air soft and triumphant, but it wasn’t.” Whoops! He strikes a characteristic note here: the gracious smooth description, verging on sentimental cliche, and then suddenly he upsets the sentence cart. If swift turns in perfect-pitch language give pleasure, you will find pleasure here.

Boyle’s askew prose sucks up ironic takes on contemporary reality like a mighty vacuum cleaner. In “Acts of God,” when the TV goes blooey in the morning because of the wife’s breakfast-flinging tantrum, she wants instant repair and considers dialing 911. But this is only an aside as Boyle dissects the late-life blues, the loss and longing of men and women who never learn from failure that spousehood can’t make up for everything; marriage may be a loss in itself, and repeated marriage a repeated defeat. 911 won’t come to the rescue.

In some of the later stories, those about illness, breakdown, death, the fracturing of family, the dissolutions and disappearances and tragic inevitability of mortality, the effort of the yarn-spinner to make something Deep can seem powered more by intention than by compulsion. A rhythm of direly emphatic, melodramatic endings, with Papa Hemingway prose-helpers, shows up: “He would be back, she knew that now, and she would be ready for him.” Or: “But Cullum would. Oh yes, Cullum would. Cullum was on for the long haul.” Or: “There’s nothing out there, nothing contained in nothing,” a grieving husband thinks as he holds his wife, but as I held the book, I was thinking: There’s writing out there, writing contained in writing. Perhaps I shouldn’t resent this gifted fabulist but rather resent myself for meanly letting me down. I jump off the ride when the smell of derivation from, say, Hemingway enters my nostrils. Others will surely be more accepting. A legitimate way to look at the less compelling stories is to remember that every writer practices his trade, Boyle is a skilled professional--a writer who writes--and the exercise of technique has value. Hey, this is a book of nearly 700 pages, and he’s still at mid-career.

Advertisement

Ironist and adventurer among the potholes and prat falls of the American language--how we utter, mangle and stretch it--Boyle doesn’t quite deserve the title of philosopher king or teeth-clenching prophet. In some of his novels, like “The Road to Wellville,” he issues a broad assault on the history of American self-invention but loses some of the fun to the obligations of earnestness. Implicit preaching is still a variety of preaching. To borrow a distinction made by Susan Sontag, he is more of a lover than a husband; he visits in the night, enlivens and departs, leaving metabolism improved. That’s not a trivial pleasure. As James Joyce said: “No, Madame, it’s quadrivial.”

Not every yarn-spinner needs to be the philosopher king of an epoch. But when the spinner of yarns is as adept at composing his tapestry as T. Coraghessan Boyle, he is a source of philosophy in others and, yes, he can call himself Maestro.

Advertisement