Lawsuit alleges utility company is responsible for deadly McKinney fire in Northern California

Two people embrace in the charred remains of their home.
Sheri Marchetti-Perrault and James Benton sift through the remains of their home, destroyed by the McKinney fire. A lawsuit has been filed alleging the cause of the massive, deadly wildfire.
(Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times)

Residents in the McKinney fire burn area sued PacifiCorp this week, alleging that sparks from the utility’s high-voltage transmission lines and other equipment ignited the deadly blaze last month near the California-Oregon border.

The McKinney fire has burned more than 60,000 acres in rural Siskiyou County since it began on July 29. Four people died as the fire swept through the area, and hundreds of homes were damaged or destroyed, according to authorities. The official cause of the fire, which is 95% contained, remains under investigation.

PacifiCorp, which is owned by Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway Energy holding company, operates an electrical grid across Oregon, Washington and Northern California. The utility company reported to California regulators that it operates a power line that runs near Highway 96 in Siskiyou County where the McKinney fire is thought to have started, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection reported.

Residents whose homes and property were destroyed or damaged in the fire claim the utility “negligently, recklessly, and willfully failed” to inspect and maintain its equipment in dry vegetation, according to their complaint filed Monday in Sacramento Superior Court. They argue PacifiCorp should have been aware that the conditions surrounding its equipment and the strong winds and low humidity created a hazard that led to the wildfire.


“This wildfire was not the result of an ‘act of God’ or other force majeure,” the lawsuit says. “This wildfire was started by sparks from high-voltage transmission lines, distribution lines, appurtenances, and other electrical equipment within PacifiCorp’s utility infrastructure that ignited surrounding vegetation.”

There are 25 plaintiffs named in the lawsuit filed by the San Diego-based law firm Singleton Schreiber. They claim the utility company “prioritized profits over safety” and was aware of extreme fire risk in the surrounding areas where the fire started.

Attorney Gerald Singleton called the fire “totally avoidable” and said his firm believes that the utility company’s equipment failure is to blame.

“Every fire season, California is overrun by deaths, injuries, financial disasters, charred homes and ruined lives as a result of utilities such as PacifiCorp putting profits over safety,” Singleton said in a statement. “This is the second time in the last two years that PacifiCorp has started a fire that killed citizens of Siskiyou County.”

Singleton’s firm has also sued PacifiCorp in connection with the 2020 Slater fire, which killed two people, destroyed nearly 200 homes and burned about 160,000 acres in Northern California and southern Oregon.

Forest officials identified Kathy Shoopman, 73, as one of the four people killed in the McKinney fire burning in California’s Siskiyou County.

Aug. 8, 2022

A spokesperson for PacifiCorp declined to comment, citing the ongoing litigation.

The McKinney fire raged along the Northern California border and in the Klamath National Forest. It was fueled by intense heat, dry vegetation and low humidity.


Four separate times, columns of smoke rose from the flames beyond the altitude at which a typical jet flies, penetrating the stratosphere and injecting a plume of soot and ash miles above the Earth’s surface. It’s a phenomenon known as a pyrocumulonimbus cloud, a byproduct of fire that NASA once memorably described as “the fire-breathing dragon of clouds.”

Times staff writer Corinne Purtill contributed to this report.