Joint Surgery: Dr. Jason Snibbe on The Role of Robotic Reconstruction in Orthopedics
- Share via
Key Facts
- Robotic-assisted joint surgery uses 3D mapping and real-time feedback to improve precision.
- Minimally invasive techniques mean less trauma, less pain, and quicker recovery.
- Haptic feedback systems in robotic tools prevent accidental damage to healthy tissue.
- Personalized implant placement improves alignment and long-term joint performance.
- Joint injections can support recovery and manage pain before or after surgery.
Orthopedics is in the middle of a quiet revolution—and it’s being led, in part, by robots. The rise of robotics is changing healthcare and the healthcare industry, from patient care to hospital workflows. Innovation and medical robotics are driving change in orthopedics, allowing for more precision and efficiency.
Robotic assisted joint surgery has changed how we approach complex cases, patients get more precise outcomes with faster recovery times and it’s a big deal in the overall surgical field. As Dr. Jason Snibbe, a board certified orthopedic surgeon says: “It’s completely changed how we operate. We now see the body in 3D—something we couldn’t do before.”
Table of Contents
- How Robotic Surgery Works in Joint Reconstruction
- Minimally Invasive Meets Maximally Effective
- Personalized Joint Replacement: A Game-Changer
- Beyond the Operating Room: Data-Driven Training and Outcomes
- Complementary Therapies: Injections and Pain Relief
- Closing Thoughts
- References
How Robotic Surgery Works in Joint Reconstruction
The key to robotic assisted joint surgery is planning and precision. Before the surgery even starts, surgeons use preoperative CT scans to build a 3D map of the joint. This digital blueprint guides every step of the operation, from incision to implant placement, all in the hospital operating room.
Once in the operating room, the robotic system is like a GPS for the surgeon. The da Vinci is an example of such technology. Advanced surgical systems like the da Vinci are used in hospitals for joint surgery as well as other kinds.
These systems provide real time feedback on critical things like ligament tension, bone alignment, and implant position. Artificial intelligence is integrated into these systems to enhance precision and support decision making during the procedure. If something moves or shifts, the system adjusts so everything stays within safe margins.
“It’s like going from a paper map to GPS,” Dr. Snibbe says. “We know exactly where we are and where everything needs to go.”
Minimally Invasive Meets Maximally Effective
One of the biggest benefits of robotic joint surgery is its typically done with minimally invasive procedures. These procedures involve small incisions which means less damage to surrounding tissues, less post op pain and quicker healing compared to traditional surgery. Arthroscopic surgery—a technique using tiny cameras and tools inserted through small cuts—is often paired with robotic assistance to do precise targeted repairs.
And it’s not just about cutting less—it’s about cutting smarter. Robotic tools have haptic feedback which prevents surgical instruments from moving outside the designated zone. This built in safety net protects healthy tissue from accidental damage which is especially important when operating near nerves or blood vessels.
“These tools make me better than I could ever be on my own,” Dr. Snibbe says. “They make surgery safer, faster and more predictable.”
Personalized Joint Replacement: A Game Changer
Every patient is different. That’s why robotic assisted surgery allows for personalized implant placement, better alignment and function of the new joint. Robotic assisted techniques are now used in many orthopedic surgeries including hip replacement to enhance precision and support minimally invasive procedures. Proper placement helps balance surrounding ligaments and distribute stress evenly which is critical for long term joint health.
In fact, a growing body of research shows that robotic assisted knee replacements have better early outcomes compared to traditional methods—fewer complications, less pain and faster recovery [1]. This is especially important for active patients who want to maintain their lifestyle after surgery as personalized treatment plans can be developed using robotic assisted data to further improve patient care and rehabilitation.
Beyond the Operating Room: Data Driven Training and Outcomes
Dr. Snibbe doesn’t just perform robotic surgeries—he also trains surgeons around the world to use these tools. “It’s not just about the numbers,” he says. “It’s about understanding how those numbers translate into patient outcomes. That’s the real mastery.”
In addition to training surgeons it’s crucial for healthcare professionals to gain expertise in healthcare robotics to ensure safe and efficient integration of these technologies. Healthcare organizations are increasingly adopting robotic systems to improve outcomes and streamline workflows. That includes learning how to interpret data from the robotic platform to make better intraoperative decisions.
For example, knowing how much force is being applied to a ligament can guide how the joint is balanced and aligned. Ultimately, robotic systems provide consistency and reproducibility, two factors that contribute significantly to better outcomes in orthopedic surgery [2] while supporting healthcare professionals through advanced training and technology.
Complementary Therapies: Injections and Pain Relief
While robotic surgery is the foundation of modern joint care, it’s often part of a bigger picture. For some patients joint injections such as hyaluronic acid or corticosteroids may be used to manage pain before surgery or to support healing after surgery. These injections can provide temporary relief, reduce inflammation and even delay surgery in some cases [3].
Used strategically these treatments are part of a larger philosophy of joint preservation: do everything possible to reduce pain, improve function and maintain natural joint structures when possible.
We try to avoid corticosteroid injections because it’s not good for the overall joint health. Sometimes they are necessary to help decrease inflammation and get people out of pain. The use of biologic, including platelet rich plasma and bone marrow taken from the patient and injected into the joint can help decrease inflammation, increase blood flow, and stabilize cartilage. These treatments can help patients increase their function and decrease their pain. And in some circumstances, it can delay surgery.
Closing Thoughts
From real-time 3D guidance to tissue sparing techniques and data informed decision making, robotic assisted joint reconstruction is changing what’s possible in orthopedic care. It gives patients less pain, faster recovery and better long term outcomes. These advancements help improve care and save lives by increasing precision and reducing complications in the hospital.
Most importantly these tools allow surgeons to combine their experience with technology to deliver results that are more personalized, more accurate and more human centered with a focus on enhancing patient life and outcomes in modern medicine and healthcare.
As Dr. Snibbe says “The goal is simple: relieve pain, restore function and help people get their lives back”. The broader impact of robotics on medicine and healthcare is shaping the future, new ways to preserve life and transform patient care.
Learn More from Dr. Jason Snibbe
To explore Dr. Jason Snibbe’s approach to orthopedic surgery, innovative techniques, and patient-centered care, visit drjasonsnibbe.com or follow him on Instagram @drjasonsnibbe for expert insights and updates.
References
[1] Marchand, R. C., Sodhi, N., Anis, H. K., Ehiorobo, J., Newman, J. M., Taylor, K., Condrey, C., Hepinstall, M. S., & Mont, M. A. (2019). One-Year Patient Outcomes for Robotic-Arm-Assisted versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty. The journal of knee surgery, 32(11), 1063–1068. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1683977
[2] Zhang, J., Ndou, W. S., Ng, N., Gaston, P., Simpson, P. M., Macpherson, G. J., Patton, J. T., & Clement, N. D. (2022). Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 30(8), 2677–2695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06464-4
[3] Bannuru, R. R., Osani, M. C., Vaysbrot, E. E., Arden, N. K., Bennell, K., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A., Kraus, V. B., Lohmander, L. S., Abbott, J. H., Bhandari, M., Blanco, F. J., Espinosa, R., Haugen, I. K., Lin, J., Mandl, L. A., Moilanen, E., Nakamura, N., Snyder-Mackler, L., Trojian, T., Underwood, M., … McAlindon, T. E. (2019). OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 27(11), 1578–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011
MORE DOCTORS & SCIENTISTS
