Cardinal Mahony’s deal with the devil
Do we have a little spat going on now at the Archdiocese of Los Angeles?
Archbishop Jose Gomez and Cardinal Roger M. Mahony seemed to be going at each other in recent days over the molestation scandal that just won’t die, thanks to Mahony’s years-long efforts to keep all the dirty little secrets under wraps.
On Wednesday, Gomez issued a rebuke, announcing that Mahony was being relieved of public duties now that the priest personnel records have been made public. And by the way, I’m not clear as to why it took Gomez two years to look into the files he describes as making “brutal and painful reading,” for their descriptions of behavior that was “terribly sad and evil.”
But even as Mahony was being kicked aside by Gomez, church spokesman Tod Tamberg was eagerly telling us Mahony is still “a priest in good standing” who can celebrate Mass and even, as a cardinal, vote for pope.
A priest in good standing? What in the world do you have to do to fall out of favor?
Within the last week, we’ve learned that Mahony and his top deputies helped shield accused molesters from police, which allowed them to prey on new victims.
Then, on Friday, Mahony did what he does best.
He went into full PR mode.
He fired off a crotchety letter to Gomez in which he spun like a champ, arguing that he has in fact led the way on reforms protecting children. He spun as if he was trying to get up enough speed to spin himself all the way to heaven.
He asked Gomez why he’s had nothing to say until now, which is a fair but rhetorical question, since Mahony knows PR better than anyone. And although the cardinal admitted to a mistake or two while overseeing the festering molestation scandal, he had the audacity to claim that “nothing” in his “background” had equipped him to “deal with this grave problem.”
Not common sense?
Not the master’s degree in social work?
Not the earlier experience of the molestation scandal in Stockton, where Mahony was assigned before his move to Los Angeles?
Do you need special training to know that the rape, abuse and psychological torture of children has to be stopped immediately? Or that your first responsibility when you hear about a child being molested isn’t to protect the church’s reputation, but to get help for the victims and make sure the priest is brought to justice?
Mahony would have you believe that the mid-1980s were the Dark Ages.
They were not.
The sexual abuse of children was heinous then, as it always has been. When it happens, you save the children before you try to save your own career, because if you don’t, everything you claim to stand for is destroyed.
Folks, if you have it in you, say a prayer for this man whose many good deeds will always be overshadowed by his failings. For years, he has admitted misdeeds and offered apologies only when forced to, and many of his reforms, too, were driven by public pressure and lawsuits on behalf of more than 500 victims.
FOR THE RECORD:
An earlier version of this article said lawsuits were filed on behalf of more than 600 victims; it should have said more than 500.
I spent a few hours Friday reading through files Mahony has fought for years to keep out of the hands of police, prosecutors and the public. Even when you know what you’re in for, as we all do by now, the deeply disturbing details of abuse — along with the repeated missed opportunities to act on Mahony’s part — are stomach-turning.
Early in 1987, Mahony was sent a report from a “treatment center” about Father Michael Baker, who had earlier admitted his history of molestation to Mahony. The report describes in detail Baker’s confessions about his years-long sexual abuse of teenage boys and says he was also involved with the mother of one boy.
“As I see it,” says the author of the report, “he is looking at several second degree felony charges and civil liability that could go into the millions of dollars in terms of what he did with both of these kids.”
And that might have been the case, if Mahony had called the police. Instead, the following month, Mahony wrote to Baker.
“Dear Mike: I am writing to assure you of my continuing prayers and interest in you and your progress, as I was pleased to receive the recent report from those involved in your care.”
Mahony later allowed Baker to return to ministry. The priest was ordered to stay away from children, but was not monitored. He was soon abusing new victims and in 2007 pleaded guilty to molesting two boys and was sentenced to 10 years in prison.
After evidence of Baker’s continued abuse came to light, some officials in the archdiocese began planning for a notice to be read from the pulpit in churches where Baker had worked, in case there were other victims. Mahony wanted to avoid that. “There is no alternative to public announcements at all the masses in 15 parishes???” he asked in a memo to a colleague. “Wow, that really scares the daylights out of me!!”
The more you know about what went on, the more you must demand to know how Mahony could have gotten away with it for so long.
Of course, Mahony is a powerful man with powerful allies in a very insular community. He was able to hire connected, influential lawyers who resisted every media attempt to expose the truth. A retired judge served on Mahony’s toothless sexual abuse advisory board, which had no real purpose other than to make it look like Mahony was doing something.
I’m tired of hearing former L.A. County Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley say he tried to expose the scandal and prosecute perpetrators and their supervisors but was hamstrung by statutes of limitations, which had lapsed in many of the cases.
Nonsense. Cooley needed more courage and less caution. Regardless of whether he could have proved conspiracy or any other crimes against top officials, Cooley should have found a way to use a grand jury to get hold of the records that now, upon their release, are so utterly damning.
But maybe Mahony has been brought low enough by this enduring stain on his legacy. Trying to save his own skin was a deal with the devil, and for that, there’s hell to pay.
The stories shaping California
Get up to speed with our Essential California newsletter, sent six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.