Advertisement

Gov. Brown wants Supreme Court to allow private-prison deals

Gov. Jerry Brown, shown here in January pledging to appeal prison crowding caps before the U.S. Supreme Court, says he is optimistic about negotiations between the state and lawyers for inmates.
Gov. Jerry Brown, shown here in January pledging to appeal prison crowding caps before the U.S. Supreme Court, says he is optimistic about negotiations between the state and lawyers for inmates.
(Paige St. John / Los Angeles Times)
Share

SACRAMENTO -- Gov. Jerry Brown is back on the doorstep of the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking an order to let him go ahead with contracts that would send thousands more inmates to private prisons out of state.

The governor notified federal judges in California on Thursday that he is appealing their order temporarily blocking those contracts while the judges force California to explore other possible solutions to prison crowding. The governor’s lawyers at the same time announced a similar appeal with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that would be taken up only if the Supreme Court refuses to hear Brown’s case.

The court documents cite California’s recent legislation approving expansion of private prison contracts along with continued state funding of county probation programs meant to lower crime rates. Based on that law, Brown had asked federal judges for an extra three years to deal with prison crowding. Instead, they approved only a two-month delay, until late February, and ordered the state into negotiations with prisoners’ lawyers.

Advertisement

“The state is appealing to protect California’s right to implement SB 105, in the event that California is not granted additional time to comply with the court-ordered prison population cap,” corrections spokeswoman Deborah Hoffman said in a written statement.

State Senate leader Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) said he viewed the governor’s appeal as a “procedural move” to protect his legal options. “It’s my expectation that the administration will continue good-faith negotiations to reach a durable solution as we prioritized” in the recent legislation, Steinberg said.

Nevertheless, Steinberg renewed his opposition to expanding the use of private prisons, calling them a “waste of taxpayer resources” that “fails to address the true reason for continuous overcrowding.”

“Tax dollars will be better spent assuring that people who leave jail and prison have the tools to avoid returning,” Steinberg said in a written response. “That is the end the state should continue to seek with the court’s help.”

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court refused to hear Brown’s second appeal of the prison population cap itself.

ALSO:

Advertisement

California signs private-prison deal

California seeks private-prison deals

Federal order brings halt to private-prison deals

paige.stjohn@latimes.com

Advertisement