Newton: A sheriff who does what he likes

Los Angeles Police DepartmentPoliticsPublic OfficialsLee BacaMark Ridley-Thomas

It's understandable that the Los Angeles County supervisors, confronted with a series of troubling reports of violence against inmates by sheriff's deputies in the county jails, are appointing a special commission to investigate the department and recommend reforms. That was the approach Mayor Tom Bradley took in 1991 after the Rodney King beating rocked confidence in the Los Angeles Police Department and fueled public demands for change. The Christopher Commission ultimately became a model of modern police inquiry and helped restore confidence not only in the LAPD but in Los Angeles itself.

But this commission may have a hard time following in those footsteps. The Sheriff's Department is an entirely different entity than the LAPD, and the recommendations of an outside inquiry would be unlikely to lead to change.

The principal issue that confronted the Christopher Commission, nicknamed for its chairman, Warren Christopher, was the inadequacy of civilian oversight of the LAPD. Nominally, the chief reported to the Police Commission, whose members were appointed by the mayor. But the police chief at the time, Daryl F. Gates, had contempt for Bradley and was protected from effective discipline by the city's Civil Service rules.

Brilliantly led by its namesake, the Christopher Commission documented the extent and severity of the LAPD's failings. Using the departments own records, the commission exposed shocking evidence of racism and systemic brutality in the department, and then made recommendations for how to strengthen civilian control to confront those issues. It created the Office of the Inspector General to give the Police Commission investigative powers; it recommended significant reforms in the LAPD's disciplinary process; and, most memorably, it urged amending the City Charter to limit the chief of police to two five-year terms. Over Gates' furious objections, voters approved the reforms and put the LAPD back on the path to professionalism, where it remains today.

At the Sheriff's Department, however, the troubles are not with oversight in the same sense. Unlike the police chief, the sheriff is an elected official, and thus theoretically answers to the voters every four years. But this also means that unlike the police chief, he can't be fired or disciplined. In effect, he has no boss but the voters, and that means an investigatory commission, no matter how effectively it does its job, will have little leverage.

The problem at the Sheriff's Department hasn't been a lack of civilian monitoring. Michael Gennaco heads the county's Office of Independent Review, and though his operation is sometimes accused of being too close to the department, he performs functionally much the same job as the Police Commission's inspector general. Moreover, the county separately contracts with Merrick Bobb, president of the Police Assessment Resource Center and a nationally respected expert on policing practices. Bobb's quarterly reports are a model of civilian oversight, and regularly called attention to issues in the jail.

The trouble with the Sheriff's Department, then, is not that it lacks civilian oversight or ideas for improvement, but rather that Sheriff Lee Baca is so insulated from normal channels of pressure that he simply does what he likes. Because he's an elected official who has never faced serious opposition at the polls, all the civilian oversight in the world can't force him to do what he doesn't want to do. The LAPD had slipped the bonds of civilian control, but control could be reestablished; the Sheriff's Department is insulated by politics.

Baca has shrugged off important suggestions in the past. He delayed installing cameras in the jails, for instance, and he's been slow to restrict steel-toed boots and the use of flashlights as weapons to subdue inmates. Bobb and others have pressed Baca for change, and now the supervisors are doing the same.

It's hard to see how a high-profile commission can be more successful. No matter what it recommends, Baca will remain a separately elected official, answerable to the supervisors for his budget but otherwise beyond their control. The state Constitution mandates that counties elect sheriffs; no commission can change that. And that makes Baca impervious to the kinds of pressures that can be applied to the police chief.

In explaining his support for the new commission, Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas, who served on the City Council during the King controversy, inadvertently put his finger on the dilemma that confronts this latest effort to improve the work of local law enforcement.

"To leave it exclusively under the domain of the sheriff," he said of addressing problems in the jails, "is problematic." And yet, it's also unavoidable. That's what may make the work of this new commission exceptionally difficult.

jim.newton@latimes.com

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
Los Angeles Police DepartmentPoliticsPublic OfficialsLee BacaMark Ridley-Thomas
  • Daniele Watts case: Did confrontation with LAPD have to happen?
    Daniele Watts case: Did confrontation with LAPD have to happen?

    Here’s the basic question about the case of Daniele Watts, the young black actress who was detained and handcuffed on a Studio City sidewalk Thursday after refusing to provide identification to police officers: Did the confrontation have to happen at all?   

  • James Hahn: An L.A. mayor to remember
    James Hahn: An L.A. mayor to remember

    In a city of big egos and bigger-than-life politicians, the accomplishments of a courageous and hardworking mayor who avoided the limelight tend to get lost. That makes it especially gratifying that the Los Angeles City Hall East building will soon be renamed in honor of former Mayor James...

  • Chief Charlie Beck talks about perfecting the LAPD
    Chief Charlie Beck talks about perfecting the LAPD

    That TV-friendly phrase "top cop"? It doesn't begin to describe Charlie Beck's job as the chief of the LAPD. Just how much the job entails became clear during the application process for his second five-year term. He's a lawman, yes, but also a diplomat, civic preacher,...

  • Ferguson's police force can learn from LAPD
    Ferguson's police force can learn from LAPD

    The ongoing violence in Ferguson, Mo., is dismaying and — for those who have been in Los Angeles a long time — painfully familiar. As this city long ago learned, when the public loses trust in its police, many people suffer.

  • LAPD's faulty crime data
    LAPD's faulty crime data

    Over the last decade, Los Angeles has made the CompStat crime mapping system the foundation of the Police Department, with crime statistics informing decisions on where to deploy officers and how to make the city safer. The LAPD's data-driven policing has been credited with reducing...

  • Reappoint Charlie Beck as police chief
    Reappoint Charlie Beck as police chief

    Should Charlie Beck be reappointed? Yes. But that answer would be expected from someone the chief has called his partner in police reform for 12 years.

  • Reappoint Chief Beck? Yes
    Reappoint Chief Beck? Yes

    At the beginning of the year, it seemed to be a foregone conclusion that Los Angeles Police Chief Charlie Beck would be reappointed for a second five-year term. He's led the department during a remarkable period of safety and stability. Crime has continued to fall under his watch. The...

  • No raises for city workers, L.A. -- not yet
    No raises for city workers, L.A. -- not yet

    The economy is gaining steam, home prices are up and tax revenue is on the rise in California and Los Angeles, giving government some extra money to restore cuts made during the recession. It's understandable, then, that city employee unions — whose members gave up raises and were...

Comments
Loading