California | Local
National
World
Business
Sports
Washington
Science
Environment
Opinion
Entertainment The Hot List Company Town Arts & Culture Calendar The Envelope TV Listings Movie Showtimes
Travel Health Autos Home & Garden Food Image Books Brand X Magazine
Data Desk
Photography
Obituaries
Crosswords/Sudoku
Your Scene
Blogs
Columnists
Print Edition
Readers Rep
Corrections
All Sections
Buy, Sell & More Jobs Cars latcars Real Estate Foreclosure Sale Rentals Personals Local Values Coupons Newspaper Ads
Place an Ad In the Newspaper Online
Settings/Services Sign In Register E-Mail Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Help
Contact Us
L.A. Times Archives
Reprint Requests
Work for Us
Home Delivery Customer Support Subscribe
Entertainment The Hot List Company Town Arts & Culture Calendar The Envelope TV Listings Movie Showtimes
Travel Health Autos Home & Garden Food Image Books Brand X Magazine
Buy, Sell & More Jobs Cars latcars Real Estate Foreclosure Sale Rentals Personals Local Values Coupons Newspaper Ads
Place an Ad In the Newspaper Online
Settings/Services Sign In Register E-Mail Newsletters
RSS Feeds
Help
Contact Us
L.A. Times Archives
Reprint Requests
Work for Us
Home Delivery Customer Support Subscribe
Editorial
Bailout handouts
The Senate's version of the $700-billion Wall Street financial package is larded with pork.
» Discuss Article
(20 Comments)
When the House balked at the Bush administration's $700-billion plan to aid Wall Street, stocks plummeted and the credit crisis intensified. Key lending rates skyrocketed, threatening to drive even more adjustable-rate mortgages into default. General Electric Co., its financial business withering, announced plans for a $12-billion cash infusion -- plus at least $3 billion from Warren Buffet. California Treasurer Bill Lockyer even warned that the frozen credit markets threatened the state's ability to pay its bills, as well as jeopardizing new bond issues for highway, school, housing and water projects.
So how did proponents of the bailout respond? By larding it with tax breaks, handouts and pet projects. The 109-page House bill ballooned to 451 pages in the Senate as sponsors pumped it full of tax cuts for clean-energy projects, disaster-stricken areas in the South and Midwest, investments in research and development, and individuals facing the alternative minimum tax. They also tacked on a bill to require certain employer-provided healthcare plans to bring mental health coverage into line with benefits provided for other ailments.
So how did proponents of the bailout respond? By larding it with tax breaks, handouts and pet projects. The 109-page House bill ballooned to 451 pages in the Senate as sponsors pumped it full of tax cuts for clean-energy projects, disaster-stricken areas in the South and Midwest, investments in research and development, and individuals facing the alternative minimum tax. They also tacked on a bill to require certain employer-provided healthcare plans to bring mental health coverage into line with benefits provided for other ailments.
Some of the provisions are certainly welcome, such as the lower tax rate for Hollywood studios that shoot films in the United States. Others, such as the elimination of excise taxes on wooden arrows for children, just seem frivolous. The message, though, was that supporters of the financial industry bailout had given up trying to convince voters that it was in their interests too, and not just Wall Street's. Instead, they coated the bitter bailout pill with a bunch of end-of-session sweeteners to make it easier to swallow.
The Senate-passed measure, which the House is expected to vote on this week, kept the core of the administration's plan largely intact. The Treasury Department would still seek to buy distressed assets, such as mortgage-backed securities, from financial institutions to help clarify their worth and the health of the banks that hold them. If it's executed properly, the bailout should provide that clarity without requiring the government to overpay for troubled assets. And that's what lawmakers should be voting for, with or without handouts.
The Senate-passed measure, which the House is expected to vote on this week, kept the core of the administration's plan largely intact. The Treasury Department would still seek to buy distressed assets, such as mortgage-backed securities, from financial institutions to help clarify their worth and the health of the banks that hold them. If it's executed properly, the bailout should provide that clarity without requiring the government to overpay for troubled assets. And that's what lawmakers should be voting for, with or without handouts.
|
Post Comment |
Discussion Comments are now closed.
1. When pork-barrel politics, redirecting blame and re-election wins are the measures of power in Congress, Americans cannot rely on a Congress bankrupt of money, ideas, and scruples to find solutions for America's wealth and leadership meltdown.
Congress financed deficit spending by hindering regulatory enforcement and lowering credit standards to encourage consumer borrowing to produce economic expansion.
Congress fueled the dot-com securities and sub-prime mortgage market scams that deceived irrationally exuberant investors and consumers.
End Congress' abuse of power! Limit Congressional terms to 18 years cumulative.
Submitted by: John Patrick Smith 12:06 AM PDT, Oct 3, 2008 Submitted by: Nancy Macky 3:28 PM PDT, Oct 2, 2008 Submitted by: David Shedlock 3:14 PM PDT, Oct 2, 2008 |
|
OPINION »
The U.S. needs to create a system that responds to labor market needs, provides more effective enforcement and offers a fair way to deal with those living here illegally.
|
 |
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
My television pretty much stays dark during the week, so it took until the...
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
Social networks are partly about broadcasting information to a far-flung...
|
||
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
National Headlines
