PALMDALE : Court Says City Broke Meetings Law
A state Court of Appeal panel has ruled that Palmdale violated the state’s open meetings law by refusing to publicly disclose a city attorney’s memo to City Council members on a controversial development project.
The council had rebuffed requests to release the 1989 memo even though it had discussed the project--and the memo itself--at a public meeting.
Reversing a lower court ruling, the appellate court said Tuesday that the city could not claim the document was protected by attorney-client privilege after the council had discussed the issues in public.
Such a privilege would only apply to issues discussed in closed sessions, the court said.
The ruling is a victory for attorney Barbara Blinderman, who sued the city in June, 1989, on behalf of a Palmdale resident who opposed a land split approved by the city that year to permit an AM-PM Mini Market.
Plans for the project later lapsed and died during the lawsuit.
Start your day right
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
