Chronic Disease Care Gets a Digital Makeover with Virtual Consultations
- Share via
Key Facts
- A 2023 study found digital health tools significantly improved activity and function in patients with chronic conditions.
- Virtual consultations improve care access and reduce barriers like transportation and clinic overload.
- Remote patient monitoring (RPM) helps catch complications early and improves chronic disease outcomes.
- Virtual Group Visits (VGVs) offer peer support alongside clinical care, especially helpful for managing diseases like diabetes or hypertension.
- Long-term success depends on addressing digital literacy gaps and ensuring virtual care is equitable.
For people living with chronic conditions like diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, routine care means regular appointments, lab work, medication changes, lifestyle counseling. It’s a lot, but technology is helping to shift the load.
Table of Contents
- Digital Health Makes a Difference
- Why Patients and Providers Love Virtual Consultations
- Real-Time Monitoring Brings Real-World Benefits
- Virtual Group Visits: A New Layer of Support
- Healthcare Access and Convenience
- Limitations and Opportunities for Growth
- Chronic Disease Management Is Getting Better
- Closing Thoughts
- References
Digital Health Makes a Difference
A 2023 meta-analysis showed that digital health interventions improved physical activity and daily function in patients with chronic conditions by 0.29 and 0.36 respectively [1]. That may not seem like a lot but in public health terms it’s big. When patients can stay active and functional they’re less likely to end up in the ER or hospitalized.
Through telehealth platforms clinicians can review vitals, trend them, adjust treatment plans, offer lifestyle coaching—all remotely. It’s personalized care without the waiting room.
Why Patients and Providers Love Virtual Consultations
Telehealth’s value is in its flexibility. It doesn’t replace in-person visits but instead complements them by:
- Providing better access for people in rural or underserved areas
- Reducing transportation issues for older adults or those with disabilities
- Allowing more frequent, shorter check-ins without clogging up clinics
- Integrating with electronic health records for seamless care coordination
- Engaging patients through remote monitoring tools and educational content [5]
Booking a virtual consultation is easy and convenient often with same or next day availability. And insurance coverage can significantly impact the cost and accessibility of virtual consultations with many plans accepted to reduce or eliminate out of pocket expenses.
Take hypertension for example. A patient tracking blood pressure from home might text in their readings to their provider. Based on the numbers a doctor might bump up their lisinopril from 10mg to 20mg—no office visit required. It’s simple, safe and efficient. Virtual consultations also reduce wait times compared to in-person visits eliminating the need to wait in crowded waiting rooms.
Real-Time Monitoring Brings Real-World Benefits
Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) is one of the most impactful offshoots of virtual care. Whether through wearable tech like smartwatches or connected devices like glucometers and blood pressure cuffs, RPM allows providers to track patient data continuously and act fast if things start to go sideways.
Benefits of RPM include:
- Early detection of concerning trends
- Faster response times to clinical deterioration
- Better outcomes for patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary diseases [7]
RPM can also help manage chronic conditions by allowing patients to get certain prescriptions through telehealth platforms.
While most of the data is around chronic conditions, experts say RPM’s potential for post-surgical recovery or high-risk pregnancies is underutilized.
Virtual Group Visits: A New Layer of Support
Another innovation making waves? Virtual Group Visits (VGVs). These are scheduled sessions where multiple patients with similar conditions (like prediabetes or asthma) join a provider online to get education, ask questions and support each other. VGVs can also provide mental health support for patients with conditions like anxiety and depression.
Research in the American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy shows VGVs as a powerful tool in improving chronic disease outcomes while scaling access [4]. They address medical needs but also provide a sense of community—something many patients crave when managing lifelong illnesses.
Healthcare Access and Convenience
Healthcare access and convenience have improved a lot with virtual care. Patients can now schedule visits with their primary care provider or specialist from the comfort of their own home, no need to go to a medical office. Virtual care visits can be used for many medical conditions including common conditions like sinus infections, ear pain and pink eye. Patients can also use virtual care for preventive care like checking blood pressure and getting advice on over-the-counter medications.
Virtual care can also be used for mental health care where patients can get support and treatment from a mental health professional. With virtual care patients can get high quality care anytime, anywhere using a mobile device or computer and even access their patient portal to view test results, schedule visits and communicate with their provider. Many healthcare providers including board certified doctors and nurse practitioners offer virtual care services and some even accept insurance making it a convenient and affordable option for patients.
Limitations and Opportunities for Growth
Despite its success, virtual care isn’t perfect. Some of the challenges flagged in recent studies include:
- Limited long term data on safety especially in high risk groups
- Unclear outcomes in historically marginalized or digitally underserved communities
- Difficulty for patients with low digital literacy or limited internet access [6]
This highlights the need for tailored implementation strategies. It’s not enough to offer virtual care, it needs to be usable and useful for everyone. Health insurance can play a big role in making virtual care accessible and affordable for more patients.
Chronic Disease Management Is Getting Better
Thanks to virtual consultations patients have more options than ever before. Platforms now support secure messaging with care teams, asynchronous updates and even prescription refills—all without stepping foot in a clinic. The American Telemedicine Association sets standards for telehealth services to ensure the credibility and quality of care provided through virtual consultations.
Organizations like the American Heart Association support these changes. Their guidelines recommend using telehealth for post-stroke care, cardiovascular monitoring and long term management of conditions like atrial fibrillation [2], [3]. In diabetes care for example controlling hypertension is a top priority.
According to the Annals of Internal Medicine blood pressure targets should be below 80 mm Hg and medications like thiazides, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers are first line options [8]. All of this can be monitored remotely through virtual check-ins and RPM tools.
Closing Thoughts
Virtual consultations aren’t a pandemic workaround—they’re here to stay. For people with chronic conditions they offer something precious: consistency. Virtual care reduces barriers, improves monitoring and keeps patients at the center of their health journey.
In a world where managing health used to mean juggling appointments and waiting rooms, virtual consultations are creating space—for rest, autonomy and better outcomes. They are a convenient alternative to going to a doctor’s office, reducing the need for in-person visits and wait times.
References
[1] Zangger, G., Bricca, A., Liaghat, B., Juhl, C. B., Mortensen, S. R., Andersen, R. M., Damsted, C., Hamborg, T. G., Ried-Larsen, M., Tang, L. H., Thygesen, L. C., & Skou, S. T. (2023). Benefits and Harms of Digital Health Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in People With Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 25, e46439. https://doi.org/10.2196/46439
[2] Schwamm, L. H., Chumbler, N., Brown, E., Fonarow, G. C., Berube, D., Nystrom, K., Suter, R., Zavala, M., Polsky, D., Radhakrishnan, K., Lacktman, N., Horton, K., Malcarney, M. B., Halamka, J., Tiner, A. C., & American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee (2017). Recommendations for the Implementation of Telehealth in Cardiovascular and Stroke Care: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 135(7), e24–e44. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000475
[3] Kernan, W. N., Viera, A. J., Billinger, S. A., Bravata, D. M., Stark, S. L., Kasner, S. E., Kuritzky, L., Towfighi, A., & American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease (2021). Primary Care of Adult Patients After Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 52(9), e558–e571. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000382
[4] Mirsky, J. B., & Thorndike, A. N. (2021). Virtual Group Visits: Hope for Improving Chronic Disease Management in Primary Care During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 35(7), 904–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171211012543
[5] Lewinski, A. A., Walsh, C., Rushton, S., Soliman, D., Carlson, S. M., Luedke, M. W., Halpern, D. J., Crowley, M. J., Shaw, R. J., Sharpe, J. A., Alexopoulos, A. S., Tabriz, A. A., Dietch, J. R., Uthappa, D. M., Hwang, S., Ball Ricks, K. A., Cantrell, S., Kosinski, A. S., Ear, B., Gordon, A. M., … Goldstein, K. M. (2022). Telehealth for the Longitudinal Management of Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review. Journal of medical Internet research, 24(8), e37100. https://doi.org/10.2196/37100
[6] Campbell, K., Greenfield, G., Li, E., O’Brien, N., Hayhoe, B., Beaney, T., Majeed, A., & Neves, A. L. (2023). The Impact of Virtual Consultations on the Quality of Primary Care: Systematic Review. Journal of medical Internet research, 25, e48920. https://doi.org/10.2196/48920
[7] Farias, F. A. C., Dagostini, C. M., Bicca, Y. A., Falavigna, V. F., & Falavigna, A. (2020). Remote Patient Monitoring: A Systematic Review. Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 26(5), 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0066
[8] Vijan, S., & Hayward, R. A. (2003). Treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus: blood pressure goals, choice of agents, and setting priorities in diabetes care. Annals of internal medicine, 138(7), 593–602. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-7-200304010-00018
MORE DOCTORS & SCIENTISTS
