Advertisement

Voters reject abortion bans. Republicans keep pushing them. What’s going on?

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Janet Protasiewicz, left, and opponent Dan Kelly, right, at a debate.
The win by liberal Wisconsin Supreme Court Janet Protasiewicz, seen here at a debate with her conservative opponent Dan Kelly, was a major victory for abortion rights supporters.
(Morry Gash / Associated Press)
Share

Voters in swing states keep rejecting abortion bans at every opportunity.

Republicans in red states keep pushing them.

That may seem an odd conjunction, but it’s driven by an internal logic pushing the GOP ever further from voters whose support they probably need to win national elections.

While some Republican officials have begun sounding alarms over the path their party has taken, they are vastly outnumbered, and there’s little sign of a course correction ahead.

Abortion dominates swing state politics

The most recent example of voter support for abortion rights came this month in Wisconsin as Judge Janet Protasiewicz won election to that state’s Supreme Court, giving liberals a 4-3 majority on the panel for the first time in 15 years.

“Abortion was, without a doubt, a huge driving force” behind Protasiewicz’s victory, said Ben Nuckels, her campaign’s media consultant. “It encouraged turnout. It persuaded voters, especially in suburban areas.”

In addition to running up large majorities in the state’s two Democratic strongholds, the Madison area and Milwaukee, Protasiewicz won the Green Bay region, where other Democrats have struggled, and cut deeply into the margins that Republican candidates have counted on in the three suburban counties outside of Milwaukee. Ultimately, she won by an 11-point margin in a state that President Biden carried in 2020 by just 0.6%.

Young voters were especially strong for Protasiewicz: In some precincts dominated by university campuses, turnout approached the level of November’s midterm elections. Protasiewicz carried some college precincts with more than 90%.

Advertisement

She is slated to be sworn in for a 10-year term on Aug. 1. Soon after that, the court will have an opportunity to rule on the state’s abortion law, which dates to 1849 and bars the procedure in nearly all cases. As in some other states, the old law snapped back into effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade, which for half a century had guaranteed abortion rights nationwide.

Protasiewicz’s victory comes after abortion drove Democratic victories in other swing states in November, including Michigan, where Democrats took full control of state government for the first time since Ronald Reagan was president, and Pennsylvania, where they retained the governorship and took control of the state House for the first time since 2010.

But if voters in those swing states are sending a message, Republicans, including some potential presidential candidates, aren’t heeding it.

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin made a strong effort this year to enact a ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which Democrats blocked in the state Senate.
____________________________________
For the Record
April 14, 2023, 10:23 a.m.: A previous version of this article referred to Gov. Ron DeSantis as Mike DeSantis.
___________________________________

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who signed a 15-week abortion ban into law in 2022, this year proposed a six-week ban, which the state Legislature approved Thursday and DeSantis signed Thursday night.

And former Vice President Mike Pence last week praised a decision by a federal judge in Texas that would ban the commonly used abortion drug mifepristone.

The “ruling fixed a 20-year wrong,” Pence said, referring to the Food and Drug Administration’s decision in 2000 to approve mifepristone’s use. The Biden administration has appealed the judge’s ruling, and on Wednesday, a federal appeals court blocked part of it from going into effect.

Advertisement

Atty. Gen. Merrick Garland quickly announced Thursday that the Biden administration will ask the Supreme Court to preserve full and easy access to the abortion medication.

The restrictions the GOP is pushing, especially the six-week ban and the ruling against mifepristone, clearly contradict the views of most voters.

Two surveys released in the last couple of months — one by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center, the other from the Public Religion Research Institute — found that only about 1 in 4 Americans believe abortion drugs should be illegal.

Support for keeping the drugs legal was especially strong among women younger than 30, who favored keeping them available by 71% to 12%, Pew found.

Although Republicans were less supportive of abortion pills than Democrats, even among the GOP, only 35% favored making them illegal, Pew found.

That’s a big reason why Pence is virtually alone among prominent Republicans in saying anything about the judge’s ruling in the mifepristone case — most GOP members of Congress and the other presidential hopefuls have tried to avoid the subject.

Advertisement

The PRRI survey also found that Americans oppose a six-week ban by about 2 to 1. Even a 15-week ban failed to win majority support, with 52% opposed and 44% in favor.

So why are Republicans so eagerly pursuing a policy that a majority of voters don’t want?

Some are believers in the antiabortion cause for whom the goal of ending abortion may outweigh any electoral damage to their party. Matthew Kacsmaryk, the judge in the mifepristone case, for example, had a long history as a conservative Christian with strongly held views against abortion when President Trump nominated him to the bench in 2017. That’s why antiabortion groups sought out his judicial district to file their challenge to mifepristone.

Others who have less strongly held views against abortion may make a rational calculation that backing a ban will serve their personal self-interest even if it damages the party’s prospects.

Republicans in swing states suffered significant losses last year because of the abortion issue; Republicans in more conservative states did not.

Roughly two-thirds of people in Ohio, for example, say abortion should be legal in “all” or “most” cases, according to PRRI’s state-by-state survey of abortion views. But Gov. Mike DeWine won reelection last year 62% to 37% — one of the largest winning margins in state history — despite championing a six-week ban. The same goes for Gov. Brian Kemp in Georgia, who handily won reelection despite signing a six-week ban into law.

As UCLA political scientists Lynn Vavreck and Chris Tausanovitch found in research they did on voters during the 2020 presidential campaign, a significant number of Republicans say they support abortion rights, but are very willing to vote for Republican candidates who oppose them.

“They’re not really cross-pressured on the issue, because they don’t care that much” about it, Tausanovitch said in an interview last year. Among Republicans, the voters who do care about abortion have traditionally been on the antiabortion side.

Advertisement

Last summer’s Supreme Court decision changed that somewhat. It increased the number of voters who care enough about abortion to base their votes on it. That’s especially true when voters see immediate stakes in an election — the future of the state’s 1849 abortion law in Wisconsin, for example.

But abortion, alone, isn’t enough to change the political math in the deeply conservative places that most Republican lawmakers represent. In Congress, for example, fewer than 20 of the 221 Republican members represent districts that are truly competitive in a general election. The vast majority, 192, come from districts that the nonpartisan Cook Political Report rates as solidly Republican.

In those places, the election about which officials worry most is their primary, and the voters who show up for those more often want their representatives to fight, not compromise.

Since at least 1980, when the GOP put strong antiabortion positions into its party platform, Republicans have counted on the support of antiabortion voters. For years, that support buoyed Republican prospects. Now that in much of the country it weights them down, it may be too late to change course.

Check out "The Times" podcast for essential news and more.

These days, waking up to current events can be, well, daunting. If you’re seeking a more balanced news diet, “The Times” podcast is for you. Gustavo Arellano, along with a diverse set of reporters from the award-winning L.A. Times newsroom, delivers the most interesting stories from the Los Angeles Times every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Listen and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.

The latest from the campaign trail

Column: Here’s why an unhinged Trump can’t be ignored, tempting as it may be

Advertisement

Former President Trump thrives on attention the way plants need water and all of us need oxygen. He famously said bad publicity is sometimes better than none at all. So it’s tempting to deny Trump his drug of choice and the means he uses to perpetuate his never-ending cash grab. His rallies are easily ignorable, having long assumed the diminished feel of a faded band grinding out stale oldies on the county fair circuit. Even Fox News (motto: Ratings Over Country) no longer carries them live. But turning away doesn’t mean Trump would go away, Mark Barabak writes in his column.

The latest from the courts

In a blow to Fox News, judge rules network withheld evidence in Dominion case

Fox News was cited for “discovery misconduct” by the judge in the $1.6-billion defamation case filed by Dominion Voting Systems after he learned that recorded conversations with Trump’s attorneys were not turned over as evidence, Stephen Battaglio reported. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis said he is considering the appointment of a special master to determine whether other relevant material has been withheld.

Enjoying this newsletter? Consider subscribing to the Los Angeles Times

Your support helps us deliver the news that matters most. Become a subscriber.

The latest from Washington

Feinstein, facing calls to resign, vows to return to Senate but asks to step away from committee

Weeks after announcing she had been diagnosed with shingles, the extended absence of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) from the Senate has left Democrats in a tight spot given the party’s slim majority in the chamber, spurring some high-profile calls for her resignation. Without Feinstein, who at 89 is the oldest sitting senator, the confirmation of President Biden’s judicial and administrative nominees has been complicated. Late Wednesday, Feinstein’s office released a statement acknowledging the delays at the Judiciary Committee and announcing that she has asked Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y) “to allow another Democratic senator to temporarily serve until I’m able to resume my committee work,” Alexandra Petri reported.

Feinstein’s absence puts focus on Newsom’s 2020 promise to appoint a Black female senator

Feinstein’s weeks-long absence from Washington as she recuperates from shingles not only led to calls for her retirement, but it refocused attention on Gov. Gavin Newsom’s promise to appoint a Black woman if either of California’s U.S. Senate seats opened up, Benjamin Oreskes reported.

Signature Biden asylum reform policy is now on hold

The Biden administration will pause its signature effort to reform asylum processing at the border, Department of Homeland Security officials confirmed Wednesday. The so-called asylum processing rule, which the administration launched with great fanfare in 2022, allowed asylum officers to grant and deny asylum to migrants at the southern border, Hamed Aleaziz reported.

Advertisement

U.S. courts Ecuador president even as Latin American country’s democracy deteriorates

The Biden administration once again appears to be running into trouble as it seeks a reliable partner in Latin America, where major issues, including immigration and Chinese influence, are looming just next door. In the last year and a half, administration officials have eagerly reached out to the government of Ecuadorian President Guillermo Lasso, one of the last center-right rulers in South America, amid a tide of newly elected leftist leaders. Yet even as U.S. officials sang his praises as a pro-free-market democrat, Lasso, a millionaire former banker, was battling allegations of corruption, money laundering in Florida and ties to a drug-trafficking network, Tracy Wilkinson reported.

The latest from California

L.A. promised mental health crisis response without cops. Why isn’t it happening?

When the national 988 mental health hotline launched in July, Los Angeles County officials said they were ready for a “seamless” rollout of services that would allow callers to request unarmed mental health workers, rather than police, to respond to crises. The county would hire privately contracted teams so crisis therapists could respond 24/7, up from 18 hours a day, the county statement said. More than eight months later, none of that has come to pass: Hotline workers cannot directly dispatch mental health teams, and callers often wait hours for an emergency response, according to an analysis of county data by The Times, Lila Seidman reported

San Joaquin Valley farmers dig in for the next battle: an epic Sierra snowmelt

A slew of drenching storms, funneled across the Pacific Ocean as atmospheric rivers, have prompted prolonged flooding in large swaths of the San Joaquin Valley. For the first time in decades, Tulare Lake is reemerging from the valley floor, as rivers swollen with runoff from heavy rains and snow spill down from the Sierra Nevada into the valley, overwhelming canals and levees. The lake’s return has engulfed thousands of acres of cropland, orchards, highways and homes, upending the region’s economy, possibly for years. And even as blue skies return, the flood-weary farmers have only to look east, to the towering Sierra mantled in historic layers of snow, to know there is worse to come, Brennon Dixson reported.

Advertisement

Legislative session disrupted by ‘credible threat’ made at California Capitol

The California Legislature in Sacramento was disrupted Thursday morning after the California Highway Patrol warned of a “credible” threat to the Capitol building. A state Senate floor session was delayed and moved to another building, and legislative staffers who had not yet reported to work were asked to remain home or work remotely, Mackenzie Mays reported.

Arnold Schwarzenegger kicks asphalt, takes on pesky L.A. potholes. City says one was a service trench

Brentwood residents saw a familiar face shoveling asphalt repair mix into a hole in the street on Tuesday: Arnold Schwarzenegger. But what he thought was a pothole, it turns out, may have actually been a service trench for gas line repairs, Mays and Nathan Solis reported. The frustrated former governor and movie star took to the streets with a shovel, a bucket and a “do it yourself” attitude after he said he’d waited three weeks for the city to repair his local road.

L.A. City Council members propose $30-an-hour wage by 2028 for hotel and LAX workers

The minimum wages of workers at larger hotels and Los Angeles International Airport would rise to $30 an hour by 2028 under a proposal put forth Wednesday by several L.A. City Council members. Councilmembers Curren Price and Katy Yaroslavsky introduced a motion for a law that would boost the pay of workers at hotels with more than 60 guest rooms, Dakota Smith reported.

Advertisement

Young activists helped elect Kenneth Mejia. Now some say he’s a ‘toxic’ boss

Although he was a Pikachu-costume-wearing, corgi-toting leftist candidate, Kenneth Mejia’s unorthodox style helped fuel his insurgent campaign for Los Angeles city controller. But less than six months after Mejia, 32, trounced a career politician to win the job, two former employees allege that he created an uncomfortable work environment where personal boundaries were often blurred both in the controller’s office and during the campaign, Julia Wick reported.

Sign up for our California Politics newsletter to get the best of The Times’ state politics reporting.

Stay in touch

Keep up with breaking news on our Politics page. And are you following us on Twitter at @latimespolitics?

Did someone forward you this? Sign up here to get Essential Politics in your inbox.

Until next time, send your comments, suggestions and news tips to politics@latimes.com.

Advertisement