The dispute between Amazon and Hachette over e-book pricing heated up this weekend with a volley of open letters making various cases to the public. The latest is a response to consumers from Hachette CEO Michael Pietsch about how and why the company prices its e-books the way it does.
First, a little background. Pietsch's email address was posted on a new website created by Amazon with a call to send emails to the Hachette CEO to lower e-book prices, including talking points such as, "We have noted your illegal collusion. Please stop working so hard to overcharge for ebooks. They can and should be less expensive."
Amazon created that website in response to one created by more than 900 authors, where they posted Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos' email address urging people to write him with a message along the lines of, "We call on Amazon to resolve its dispute with Hachette without further hurting authors and without blocking or otherwise delaying the sale of books to its customers."
Since May, Amazon has prevented pre-orders of Hachette books, imposed artificial shipping delays and otherwise made it difficult to find the publisher's books on its site. Amazon began making the changes in the availability of Hachette's books while the two companies were negotiating over wholesale and retail e-book pricing -- a negotiation that is still ongoing.
Michael Pietsch mentions that negotiation in his letter, which appears in full below:
Thank you for writing to me in response to Amazon’s email. I appreciate that you care enough about books to take the time to write. We usually don’t comment publicly while negotiating, but I’ve received a lot of requests for Hachette’s response to the issues raised by Amazon, and want to reply with a few facts.
• Hachette sets prices for our books entirely on our own, not in collusion with anyone.
• We set our ebook prices far below corresponding print book prices, reflecting savings in manufacturing and shipping.
• More than 80% of the ebooks we publish are priced at $9.99 or lower.
• Those few priced higher—most at $11.99 and $12.99—are less than half the price of their print versions.
• Those higher priced ebooks will have lower prices soon, when the paperback version is published.
• The invention of mass-market paperbacks was great for all because it was not intended to replace hardbacks but to create a new format available later, at a lower price.
As a publisher, we work to bring a variety of great books to readers, in a variety of formats and prices. We know by experience that there is not one appropriate price for all ebooks, and that all ebooks do not belong in the same $9.99 box. Unlike retailers, publishers invest heavily in individual books, often for years, before we see any revenue. We invest in advances against royalties, editing, design, production, marketing, warehousing, shipping, piracy protection, and more. We recoup these costs from sales of all the versions of the book that we publish—hardcover, paperback, large print, audio, and ebook. While ebooks do not have the $2-$3 costs of manufacturing, warehousing, and shipping that print books have, their selling price carries a share of all our investments in the book.
This dispute started because Amazon is seeking a lot more profit and even more market share, at the expense of authors, bricks and mortar bookstores, and ourselves. Both Hachette and Amazon are big businesses and neither should claim a monopoly on enlightenment, but we do believe in a book industry where talent is respected and choice continues to be offered to the reading public.
Once again, we call on Amazon to withdraw the sanctions against Hachette’s authors that they have unilaterally imposed, and restore their books to normal levels of availability. We are negotiating in good faith. These punitive actions are not necessary, nor what we would expect from a trusted business partner.
Thank you again and best wishes,
If Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is also responding to inquiries from the public on this matter, we'll share his correspondence as well.
Book news and more; I'm @paperhaus on TwitterCopyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times