Medical examiner defends analysis of autopsy reports in Grim Sleeper trial
The attorney for the man accused of murdering 10 young women over a period of decades in South Los Angeles, suggested Thursday that recent reviews of the victims’ autopsy reports could be flawed.
Questions about the autopsies were raised as testimony continued in the trial of Lonnie Franklin Jr., who prosecutors allege is responsible for the grisly slayings committed by a serial killer dubbed the Grim Sleeper.
Franklin faces 10 counts of murder in the killings of nine women and a 15-year-old girl spanning more than 20 years. He also faces one count of attempted murder.
Franklin, 63, has pleaded not guilty.
On Wednesday, Fajardo testified that he had reviewed autopsies conducted by medical examiners who have since died or are unable to testify.
Amster’s questioning focused on Fajardo’s ability to have a conclusive analysis without personally conducting the autopsies, and whether the documents he reviewed were properly maintained and corresponded correctly to the victims.
For instance, Amster asked if Fajardo had any way to confirm that the medical examiner who conducted an autopsy verified the identity of the body by toe-tag. In one case, that information was written in a report. In another, it was not, Fajardo said.
On Wednesday, guided by Deputy Dist. Atty. Beth Silverman through decades-old documents, Fajardo testified that seven of the victims died from gunshot wounds to the chest, one was strangled and another suffered both strangulation and gunshot wounds.
Fajardo also testified that the trajectory of the bullets was consistent with the victims sitting in the passenger seat of a vehicle while their assailant sat in the driver’s seat. That is the method Silverman has alleged Franklin used in the killings.
Fajardo’s testimony was expected to continue Thursday afternoon.
For more Los Angeles court news, follow @sjceasar.
Get breaking news, investigations, analysis and more signature journalism from the Los Angeles Times in your inbox.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.