San Bernardino killers traded the American Dream for a nightmare of terror
David Horsey / Los Angeles Times
Since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, I have thought that, if I were a terrorist interested in generating the highest level of fear among Americans, I would not go after high-profile targets in New York or Washington; I’d seek out random soft targets in unexpected places far from the centers of power.
Welcome to San Bernardino.
The FBI has yet to determine with certainty that Wednesday’s horrific assault at the Inland Regional Center that took the lives of 14 people and left another 21 wounded was an act of terrorism, but it is becoming difficult to imagine any other characterization. The initial theory that the shooting might be explained simply as a disgruntled employee taking out his anger on co-workers seems increasingly unlikely.
FULL COVERAGE: Rampage in San Bernardino >>
Yes, Syed Rizwan Farook, one of the two shooters, was a county health worker and the scene of his crime was a staff holiday party hosted by his employer at which Farook was in brief attendance. But, when he stalked out of the gathering early, Farook did not just go pull a pistol out of his car and walk back inside to impulsively act out his anger. He returned with his wife, both dressed in combat gear, and they were armed with assault rifles, pipe bombs, handguns and hundreds of rounds of ammunition.
The 28-year-old Farook and his 27-year-old wife, Tashfeen Malik, were clearly prepared for slaughter. The fact that they dropped off their baby girl with a grandmother earlier in the morning suggests they knew that, later in the day, they would either be on the run or dead. After killing the pair in a shootout in the middle of a residential street, police found a huge cache of weapons, ammunition and bombs inside the couple’s Redlands home. This was not just a guy “going postal;” this was someone with a long-simmering plan.
Follow live coverage of the San Bernardino shooting >>
Farook, the Chicago-born son of Pakistani immigrants, brought his fiancee, Malik, into the U.S. from Pakistan on a temporary visa in 2014. After they married, she passed a security check and was issued a provisional green card. Farook had traveled to Saudi Arabia twice, in 2013 and 2014. Federal law enforcement officials say they have uncovered suspicious contacts between Farook and people with suspected ties to radical Islamists. None of this activity had put him on any terrorism watch list.
What made him turn to evil? What if his connection to a group like Islamic State or Al Qaeda turns out to be tenuous or nonexistent? What if he radicalized himself through a few brief conversations with Muslim radicals and careful study of extremist websites? What if it is easier than we have ever imagined to flip a switch in some people’s heads and transform them from mild-mannered young people to merciless killers almost overnight?
In that case, we face a threat that could go undetected and manifest itself on any day in any place on the map. How do we defend ourselves against an enemy like that?
MORE ON SAN BERNARDINO
An orison for San Bernardino, from J.S. Bach
Fact vs. fiction: What’s true about the San Bernardino shooting
California congresswoman won’t stand for moment of silence
A cure for the common opinion
Get thought-provoking perspectives with our weekly newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
More From the Los Angeles Times
-
The reopening of a migrant children’s detention center spotlights how much better the government must do with unaccompanied minors asking for help.
-
QAnon adherents seem to display characteristics associated with conspiracy theory vulnerability: an identity-related grievance, a penchant for anger and metaphysical belief.
-
A new bill in the California legislature would combat secret ownership of rental properties.
-
Community health clinics in California serve the poor, who are overwhelmingly Black and Latino. Get them vaccines!
