Advertisement

Letters to the Editor: We had a law to prevent bank failures. Trump and the GOP weakened it

People stand outside an entrance to a Silicon Valley Bank branch in Santa Clara, Calif., on March 10.
People stand outside an entrance to a Silicon Valley Bank branch in Santa Clara, Calif., on March 10.
(Jeff Chiu / Associated Press)
Share

To the editor: Your coverage of the Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank failures has been thorough, but some of your articles have omitted one very relevant fact. (“All Silicon Valley Bank customers’ funds are guaranteed, U.S. officials say,” March 12)

After the disastrous banking failures of 2008, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank law, which among other things required banks with assets over $50 billion to meet certain stress tests, including retaining sufficient liquid funds to meet likely depositor demands. The Trump administration watered that down, raising that asset threshold to $250 billion.

That let both Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank escape the tougher liquidity requirements and forced the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to take over those two. Thanks again, former President Trump.

Advertisement

Ken Goldman, Beverly Hills

..

To the editor: There is a little-known fact about the recent bank failures.

The FDIC only has $128 billion, a tiny fraction of the funds needed to cover the estimated $10 trillion in insured bank accounts. If just a few mid-sized banks failed, the FDIC itself would be insolvent.

This would require the Federal Reserve to step in and lend these banks enough to cover customers’ accounts, as it just did for Silicon Valley Bank. Such intervention on a large scale would further fuel inflation, forcing the Fed to continue raising interest rates.

The safest course for many businesses and private citizens is to park their cash in short-term government bonds.

Hal Goldberg, Laguna Woods

..

To the editor: On Monday, the front page of your print edition reported that billionaires and others with their money in Silicon Valley Bank would get a free-lunch bailout.

Advertisement

The back page of the paper had an article on “food insecurity” and poor kids cut off from government lunch programs. My advice to poor kids: Hire the same lobbyists the banks use, and you’ll never go hungry again.

Or maybe we should enforce “bailout insecurity” on billionaires?

Eric Alter, Woodland Hills

Advertisement