Advertisement
426 posts
King County, Washington, will require gun sellers to post warnings about the dangers of owning a firearm.
King County, Washington, will require gun sellers to post warnings about the dangers of owning a firearm. (Justin Sullivan / Getty Images)

In California, businesses that sell products containing known carcinogens must post “clear and reasonable” warnings about the danger of exposure consumers face (remember that brouhaha about coffee?). Look at the side of a can of beer and you find a label warning that “drinking distilled spirits, beer, coolers, wine and other alcoholic beverages may increase cancer risk, and, during pregnancy, can cause birth defects.” Ditto for tobacco products.

But in Washington state, the King County Board of Health (think Seattle) has gone one better about a consumer product with a much more immediate risk of death. It recently ordered all gun vendors in the county to post signs warning of the increased risks of danger from possession of a firearm. The signs read: “Warning: The presence of a firearm in the home significantly increases the risk of suicide, homicide, death during domestic violence disputes and unintentional deaths to children, household members and others.”

Advertisement
  • Trump
  • Opinion
  • The Swamp
President Trump points to CNN's Jim Acosta during a Nov. 7 news conference as a White House intern reaches to take the microphone away.
President Trump points to CNN's Jim Acosta during a Nov. 7 news conference as a White House intern reaches to take the microphone away. (Evan Vucci / Associated Press)

President Trump has a knack for elevating the people around him. Kind of like LeBron James — except, umm, different.

Take Trump’s ongoing feud with CNN White House correspondent Jim Acosta. For the second time this month, the president has turned Acosta into a sympathetic figure, which is remarkable to anyone who has seen Acosta ask a question in front of a live camera.

After a testy exchange during a press conference at the White House on Nov. 7, Trump’s press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, announced that Acosta’s security pass to the White House was being suspended. Sanders first accused Acosta of manhandling a female White House intern, then after CNN sued, she said Acosta had hogged the microphone in a disruptive way.

Advertisement
  • Opinion
  • Rule of Law
Julian Assange, shown in London in May 2017, reportedly has been secretly charged by U.S. prosecutors.
Julian Assange, shown in London in May 2017, reportedly has been secretly charged by U.S. prosecutors. (Dominic Lipinski / TNS)

The U.S. government has been after WikiLeaks maestro Julian Assange for eight years, ever since the site published a cache of classified documents it had obtained from U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea (then Bradley) Manning. And now we learn, through some sloppy legal paperwork, that Assange has secretly been charged by federal prosecutors.

With what, however, we don’t know. And that’s crucial.

Assange remains ensconced in Ecuador’s embassy in London, so the likelihood of him actually being extradited and prosecuted remain slim for now. But that would change if he wears out his welcome there, as some news outlets have reported he’s doing.

  • Trump
  • Opinion
  • Rule of Law
Jim Acosta walks away from the U.S. District Courthouse in Washington.
Jim Acosta walks away from the U.S. District Courthouse in Washington. (Jose Luis Magana / Associated Press)

The Trump administration is putting a positive spin on a federal judge’s order that it restore the press credential of CNN’s Jim Acosta. But make no mistake: The temporary restraining order issued on Friday by U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly (irony alert: a Trump appointee) is a defeat for the administration.

It should accept that defeat gracefully, and permanently restore Acosta’s “hard pass.”

Kelly’s order is a form of emergency relief, pending further action on the merits of CNN’s lawsuit. That’s why White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders emphasized after the ruling that Acosta’s hard pass is being “temporarily” reinstated.

  • Opinion
  • Election 2018
Nine days ago, Rep. Mimi Walters, right, looked headed for reelection. Now Democrat Katie Porter looks to be the winner.
Nine days ago, Rep. Mimi Walters, right, looked headed for reelection. Now Democrat Katie Porter looks to be the winner. (Chris Carlson / Associated Press)

What a difference (checks calendar) eight days make.

The morning after election day, things looked grim for Orange County Democrats, who had entered the fall election full of hope and enthusiasm. Election night results showed county votes falling largely behind Republicans in the House and statewide races. Although Rep. Dana Rohrabacher of Huntington Beach, the most vulnerable of the Republican House incumbents, looked like he was headed for defeat in the coastal 48th District, Republicans were leading in other county-centric House races, and O.C. votes for statewide candidates were falling on the red side of the ledger even as Democrats were winning in the overall count.

“But wait!” activists said. “They’re still counting votes!”

Advertisement
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, shown in May, has been busy this week repairing the company's image.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, shown in May, has been busy this week repairing the company's image. (Ludovic Marin / AFP/Getty Images)

A few days after the 2016 election, I attended the Techonomy tech conference in Half Moon Bay where Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg gave a rare interview. Reports were swirling at the time about people plying Facebook with fake news items in an effort to boost Donald Trump’s successful campaign, and Techonomy founder David Kirkpatrick asked whether Zuckerberg thought the social network had influenced the outcome. The youthful billionaire essentially laughed Kirkpatrick off:

We now know just how misguided Zuckerberg was about the uses of his company’s platform. Facebook has spent much of the Trump presidency dealing with revelations not just about fake news, but about foreign meddling in U.S. affairs and the mobilization of hate-fueled mobs around the world.

This week the New York Times triggered another wave of criticism with a lengthy investigation recounting how much effort Facebook put into denying its problems and attacking its critics. Responding to the Times’ tl;dr piece with one of his own, Zuckerberg unleashed a kajillion-word blog post outlining the steps Facebook has been and will be taking to minimize the amount of harmful content its users publish. He also dumped the right-of-center consultants who had defended the company too, umm, aggressively.

  • Opinion
  • Guns and Ammo
  • The Golden State
  • Rule of Law
Patrons leave the Borderline Bar and Grill in Thousand Oaks after a gunman opened fire, killing 12 people.
Patrons leave the Borderline Bar and Grill in Thousand Oaks after a gunman opened fire, killing 12 people. (Los Angeles Times)

It may be that California has temporarily exceeded its capacity for processing tragedy, and grief, after two major fires with horrific damage and death and the mass shooting at a Thousand Oaks country dance bar. But we can’t let ourselves become overwhelmed because, unfortunately, we’re likely to endure repetitions of both.

Devastating wildfires are not one-offs here. They are part of the natural cycle, though our insistence on building communities in places we know will burn overlays the grids of civilization on wild space, adding fuel to the fires and human losses to the natural toll. My colleagues on the editorial board have written eloquently about this, so I’ll leave it alone. But we know what needs to be done to lessen our exposure to the dangers.

  • Opinion
  • We're All Doomed
  • The Golden State
Authors of a study that found oceans are warming faster than previously thought erred in their math. But warming seas remain a problem.
Authors of a study that found oceans are warming faster than previously thought erred in their math. But warming seas remain a problem. (Richard E. Dodge / Sun Sentinel)

Well, that was unfortunate.

A study released a couple of weeks ago reporting that oceans were warming faster than previously anticipated turns out to have been off by a bit. By a large bit, in fact.

Advertisement
  • Opinion
  • Election 2018
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), center, joined by other GOP senators, speaks to reporters in the Capitol on Wednesday.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), center, joined by other GOP senators, speaks to reporters in the Capitol on Wednesday. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)

It’s too easy to mock Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) for writing a paean to bipartisanship … for Fox News’ website

So I leave that task to others. Of whom there are many.

Instead, allow me to offer two critiques. First, when McConnell touted the achievements of the “unified Republican government,” he failed to mention how divisive all of those accomplishments were. So divisive, in fact, that none of the pieces of legislation he cited could have passed under ordinary Senate rules. Instead, the regulatory repeals, the tax cuts and the judicial confirmations all were made possible by procedural shortcuts that barred filibusters and deterred amendments. 

CNN's Jim Acosta does a standup before President Trump's Nov. 7 news conference.
CNN's Jim Acosta does a standup before President Trump's Nov. 7 news conference. (Evan Vucci / Associated Press)

On Tuesday, CNN filed a lawsuit seeking to reverse the revocation of correspondent Jim Acosta’s White House press pass.

The complaint filed in federal court in Washington, makes a persuasive case that the administration‘s action was “the culmination of years of hostility by President Trump against CNN and Acosta based on the contents of their reporting — an unabashed attempt to censor the press and exclude reporters from the White House who challenge and dispute the president’s point of view.”

CNN is also correct in noting that the 1st Amendment has been interpreted by the Supreme Court as reflecting “a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.” The quotation is from the landmark 1964 libel case of New York Times vs. Sullivan.